Posted by Indrajith on April 29, 19103 at 10:22:45:

In Reply to: hinduism posted by Chad Hugo on April 24, 19103 at 04:55:53:

The term "Same product different package" comes to mind.

Absolutely nothing different from the posts below, the same ongoing about the lunatic phedeophile.

"Notice here that Aisha's mother and the Muslim women back then were ok with her marriage. It was part of the Arab custom and still is in many of the Muslim and non-Muslim countries today for girls to marry at a very young age. When a girl's body starts showing up (her crackss and her height and physical size), then she would be ready for marriage. This is further elaborated on in the "The Middle Eastern and other Cultures" and "What about Aisha's parents (mon and dad), are they too "Child Molesters"?" and "The life span 1400 years ago was very short" sections below in this article.

The "child molester" charge is a terrible unfair attack on Islam because it doesn't apply to our beloved prophet in anyway!
"

I will repeat this again once more. A crime is a crime. A child is someone who is not mentally developed. So what u r saying now is that if a "CHILD" starts growing brests and hit puberty at the age of six......she is ready to be F&^%$#.

or atleast that's what the followers of that lunatic should view. Disgusting satanic people.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup