Posted by Sashathe on August 27, 19101 at 22:11:06:

In Reply to: Hegel posted by Stephan Moebius on June 19, 19101 at 18:33:37:

I cannot exhaustively answer your question, but I can put in the direction. Hegel's aufhebung is the philosophy of presence, par excellance, Hegels aufhebung is a paradoxical concept that allows a progression while letting go, but still retaining, it conserves and eliminates at the same time. This is admittedly vague, but so is hegel. In relation to derrida though, the dialectic of hegel, is a mastery of presence, par excellence, because being absorbs its opposite(nothing) and kinda controls and dictates it towards a telos of absolute knowledge, in which all contradictions are eliminated and pure presense is the result. Derrida argues that this telos is not a possibility, because of the structure in the sign or mark, always has possibilities of absence,this is all related to differance, the trace , and supplemtarity,in that there is always a non-plenitude in the sign, which is not accidental, but fundamental and can never be reduced to pure presence, as is tried by almost all traditional western philosophers, in such forms of intuition. This is of course is against hegel.I understand I did not adress Adorno,because I have never delved ino critical theory, also I have only answered your questions in a way that presupposes knowledge of either thinker.

: Where is the difference between the dialectic of >Hegel and Deconstruction? But, please give the answer in the differnce views of Aufhebung. I mean, where's the differnce between a negative dialectic (Adorno) and Derrida's Deconstruction and relation to the other?

Follow Ups:

• Re: Hegel Ed 17:51:28 4/05/103 (0)
• Re: Hegel Trevor 16:17:26 3/05/103 (0)

Post a Followup